March 1st

By 1622, Shakespeare’s name had grown into a reliable commodity. Printers, hoping to boost or more humbly to ensure their sales, could count on the visible presence of “Shakespeare,” “W. Shakespeare,” or “William Shakespeare,” to sell a play. This quarto of Romeo and Juliet, published for John Smithwicke, vividly preserves this fact on its title page:

And it was no less apparent to Thomas Walkley, the publisher of a quarto of Othello dating from the same year (more on this tomorrow), who in his prefatory epistle to the reader cites Shakespeare’s own growing stature as justification for the brevity of his writing: “To commend it, I will not, for that which is good, I hope every man will commend, without intreaty: and I am the bolder, because the Authors name is sufficient to vent this work.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s